GO
(Choose up to 3 cars)
Compare Cars
99 cars match your search criteria.
Compare
Lincoln MKC Image

Lincoln MKC

#7 in Luxury Compact SUVs

Critics say that the all-new 2015 Lincoln MKC provides a powerful standard engine, nimble handling and a premium interior that compares favorably with more expensive luxury SUVs. Read full review»

Find the best local price:
U.S.News Scores
Overall:8.4
Critics' Rating:8.9
Performance:8.0
Interior:7.7
Safety:8.9
Reliability: 3_5
Compare
Lincoln MKT Image

Lincoln MKT

#6 in Luxury Large SUVs

The 2015 Lincoln MKT offers a comfortable, quiet ride, but it has frustrating infotainment controls, according to auto writers. Read full review»

Find the best local price:
U.S.News Scores
Overall:8.1
Critics' Rating:7.8
Performance:7.9
Interior:8.1
Safety:9.7
Reliability: 4_0
Compare
Lincoln MKX Image

Lincoln MKX

#17 in Luxury Midsize SUVs

The 2015 Lincoln MKX trails the competition due to its uninspired engine, dull handling and a cumbersome infotainment system, auto writers report. Read full review»

Find the best local price:
U.S.News Scores
Overall:7.5
Critics' Rating:7.1
Performance:7.2
Interior:7.6
Safety:8.9
Reliability: 4_0
Compare
Lincoln Navigator Image

Lincoln Navigator

#8 in Luxury Large SUVs

Automotive writers report that the 2015 Lincoln Navigator handles poorly and the cabin build is of uneven quality, but they say this SUV is a significant improvement over the previous year's model. Read full review»

Find the best local price:
U.S.News Scores
Overall:7.3
Critics' Rating:7.1
Performance:7.0
Interior:7.7
Safety:8.7
Reliability: 3_5
Compare
Mazda CX-3 Image
  • MSRP: $19,960 - $26,240
  • MPG: 29 City / 35 Hwy

Mazda CX-3

#1 in Affordable Subcompact SUVs

The all-new 2016 Mazda CX-3 offers a fun driving experience, great fuel economy and ample standard features, but has limited rear-seat and cargo space. Read full review»

Find the best local price:
U.S.News Scores
Overall:8.5
Critics' Rating:8.4
Performance:9.1
Interior:7.6
Safety:N/A
Reliability: NA
Compare
Mazda CX-5 Image

Mazda CX-5

#3 in Affordable Compact SUVs

The 2016 Mazda CX-5 earns great fuel economy, and reviewers say its nimble handling makes it one of the most fun-to-drive SUVs in the class. Read full review»

Find the best local price:
U.S.News Scores
Overall:8.4
Critics' Rating:8.9
Performance:8.5
Interior:7.5
Safety:9.3
Reliability: NA
Compare
Mazda CX-9 Image

Mazda CX-9

#10 in Affordable Large SUVs

Though they're disappointed in its outdated infotainment system, test drivers praise the 2015 Mazda CX-9 for its athletic handling and potent V6 engine. Read full review»

Best Cars for the Money Winner

Find the best local price:
U.S.News Scores
Overall:7.8
Critics' Rating:8.5
Performance:8.7
Interior:7.5
Safety:7.2
Reliability: 2_5
Compare
Mercedes-Benz G-Class Image

Mercedes-Benz G-Class

#17 in Luxury Midsize SUVs

Test drivers agree that the 2015 Mercedes-Benz G-Class is a standout performer off road, but its ponderous handling on the pavement and substandard fuel economy lessen its appeal. Read full review»

Find the best local price:
U.S.News Scores
Overall:7.5
Critics' Rating:7.0
Performance:6.9
Interior:7.5
Safety:N/A
Reliability: 4_0
Compare
Mercedes-Benz GL-Class Image

Mercedes-Benz GL-Class

#3 in Luxury Large SUVs

According to auto writers, the 2015 Mercedes-Benz GL-Class is a top pick in the class thanks to its premium interior, strong engine lineup and impressive ride and handling. Read full review»

Find the best local price:
U.S.News Scores
Overall:8.5
Critics' Rating:9.0
Performance:8.3
Interior:8.6
Safety:N/A
Reliability: 3_0
Compare
Mercedes-Benz GLA-Class Image

Mercedes-Benz GLA-Class

#1 in Luxury Subcompact SUVs

The luxurious interior and agile handling of the all-new 2015 Mercedes-Benz GLA-Class impress reviewers, though they note that it offers limited cargo space. Read full review»

Find the best local price:
U.S.News Scores
Overall:8.3
Critics' Rating:8.7
Performance:8.1
Interior:7.6
Safety:N/A
Reliability: 3_5
Compare
Mercedes-Benz GLK-Class Image

Mercedes-Benz GLK-Class

#10 in Luxury Compact SUVs

Critics describe the 2015 Mercedes-Benz GLK-class as having limited rear-seat space and a rigid ride, but they say it has a swanky interior and the diesel model gets terrific fuel economy. Read full review»

Find the best local price:
U.S.News Scores
Overall:8.1
Critics' Rating:8.2
Performance:7.9
Interior:7.7
Safety:10.0
Reliability: 3_5
Compare
Mercedes-Benz M-Class Image

Mercedes-Benz M-Class

#8 in Luxury Midsize SUVs

Test drivers say that the 2015 Mercedes-Benz M-Class has a comfortable ride and opulent interior, but its handling ability falls short of many competitors. Read full review»

Find the best local price:
U.S.News Scores
Overall:8.4
Critics' Rating:8.5
Performance:7.6
Interior:8.6
Safety:9.7
Reliability: 3_5
Compare
MINI Cooper Image

MINI Cooper

#6 in Affordable Subcompact Cars

The 2015 Mini Cooper is especially fun to drive, according to critics, and it is now available in a four-door model featuring roomier rear seats and extra cargo space. Read full review»

Find the best local price:
U.S.News Scores
Overall:8.0
Critics' Rating:8.6
Performance:8.7
Interior:7.5
Safety:7.9
Reliability: 2_5
Compare
MINI Cooper Countryman Image

MINI Cooper Countryman

#8 in Affordable Subcompact SUVs

The 2015 Mini Cooper Countryman handles athletically and earns great fuel economy for the class, according to automotive journalists, though it has less cargo room than many rivals. Read full review»

Find the best local price:
U.S.News Scores
Overall:7.5
Critics' Rating:7.4
Performance:8.3
Interior:7.4
Safety:10.0
Reliability: 2_5
Compare
Mitsubishi Outlander Image

Mitsubishi Outlander

#17 in Affordable Compact SUVs

Although reviewers are pleased with the 2016 Mitsubishi Outlander's interior improvements and new transmission, they agree that most rivals offer stronger engines and more upscale cabins. Read full review»

Find the best local price:
U.S.News Scores
Overall:6.9
Critics' Rating:6.9
Performance:6.9
Interior:7.3
Safety:8.5
Reliability: NA
Compare
Mitsubishi Outlander Sport Image

Mitsubishi Outlander Sport

#9 in Affordable Subcompact SUVs

Test drivers say the 2015 Mitsubishi Outlander Sport falls behind its rivals when it comes to interior styling and performance, though some say it rides smoothly. Read full review»

Find the best local price:
U.S.News Scores
Overall:6.9
Critics' Rating:6.9
Performance:6.9
Interior:6.8
Safety:9.0
Reliability: 2_5
Compare
Nissan Armada Image

Nissan Armada

#13 in Affordable Large SUVs

Even though they think the 2015 Nissan Armada has decent off-road capability, auto critics say it has poor fuel economy and numb handling.  Read full review»

Find the best local price:
U.S.News Scores
Overall:6.7
Critics' Rating:6.7
Performance:6.9
Interior:7.2
Safety:N/A
Reliability: 2_5
Compare
Nissan Juke Image

Nissan Juke

#7 in Affordable Subcompact SUVs

The 2015 Nissan Juke impresses reviewers with its peppy engine, agile handling and excellent fuel economy, though they say it has a cramped interior and small cargo area. Read full review»

Find the best local price:
U.S.News Scores
Overall:7.6
Critics' Rating:8.0
Performance:8.5
Interior:6.6
Safety:8.1
Reliability: 2_5
Compare
Nissan Murano Image

Nissan Murano

#2 in Affordable Midsize SUVs

The fully redesigned 2015 Nissan Murano has a premium interior and a composed ride, reviewers say, and it also gets excellent fuel economy for the class. Read full review»

Best Cars for the Money Winner

Best Cars for Families Winner

Find the best local price:
U.S.News Scores
Overall:8.7
Critics' Rating:9.0
Performance:7.8
Interior:8.9
Safety:9.3
Reliability: 4_0
Compare
Nissan Pathfinder Image

Nissan Pathfinder

#9 in Affordable Midsize SUVs

Critics like the 2015 Nissan Pathfinder's stellar fuel economy and upscale cabin, but they note that it falls short of competitors in terms of cargo space and its transmission can be noisy. Read full review»

Find the best local price:
U.S.News Scores
Overall:7.6
Critics' Rating:7.6
Performance:7.4
Interior:7.9
Safety:9.3
Reliability: 3_0
(Choose up to 3 cars)
Compare Cars

Safety scores should only be compared between vehicles of similar size and weight. Larger, heavier vehicles generally provide more protection than smaller, lighter ones.